Tag: colorado

  • The Decline of Hunting in the U.S. and the Threat to Wildlife Conservation

    According to the archeological dating of the Morocco Jebel Irhoud animal fossils and the Homo sapiens who ate them, humans have hunted game animals for over 300,000 years. Although humans are omnivores, they did not start farming until 23,000 years ago, according to the Ohalo II archaeological site in Israel. This means that humans needed to hunt for 277,000 years for food security.

    Kelly Maher, an avid Coloradan hunter and mother, said part of her family ethic is “we hunt to eat and we eat what we hunt.” During the Covid 19 shutdown, her family ate deer meat stored in the freezer from the previous hunting season. Maher said she believes hunting is a core part of “understanding our place in the world.”

    American wildlife suffered at the end of the nineteenth century from mismanagement, according to the Audubon Society. The bison population had diminished from 60 million to 300 in 100 years due to lack of management and overhunting according to All About Bison. Together, President Theodore Roosevelt, George Bird Grinnell and John Muir along with the Audubon Society, established a conservation movement to preserve nature.

    Roosevelt, the “conservation president,” used his authority in 1906 to protect public lands and wildlife by creating the United States Forest Service (USFS). This service established 150 national forests and 18 national monuments through the American Antiquities Act. This act protected over 230 million acres of open public space for citizens of the United States use.

    With the advent of city living, increased public criticism, and reduced barriers to food security, hunting has declined in the United States. The decline of hunters is problematic state-wide for wildlife conservation efforts that depend on funding from hunting license sales.

    According to Wildlife for All, between 1960 and 2020, hunting license sales increased by 2 million or 13.5 percent. The U.S. Census Bureau (USCB) reports that the population increased by 152 million or 84 percent. Although the number of hunters increased, it dropped from 7.8 percent of the population in 1960 to 4.8 percent in 2024.

    The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service manages nationwide conservation funding through the collection of hunting license revenue and firearms and ammunition excise sales tax from each state. The funding is distributed back to the state parks and wildlife departments that manage public land conservation and animal populations.

    “There are 180 hunting units that Colorado has divided into Game Management Units (GMUs),” Cody Heneghan, a hunt planner for Colorado Parks and Wildlife said. “These units designate which part of the state your particular license permits you to hunt in.”

    Hunting licenses for Colorado’s Western GMUs with higher elk populations are in high demand with a limited number available per year. A hunter must apply for these types of licenses through a “big game draw,” or purchase a leftover license after the draw if one is available.

    “I’m not hunting as much now because the last time I bought a license, it was in a unit with a low population and I didn’t get an elk that time,” Wally Light, a 21-year-old hunter said. “It was a lot of work without a payoff. It didn’t seem worth it.” According to Colorado Parks and Wildlife, the Federal Bureau of Land Management (BLM) manages 8 million acres of public land in Colorado. However, non of the 23,000 acres of open space and trails in rural Pitkin County are open for hunting. Open space hunting in Pitkin County Colorado is prohibited according to the Pitkin County Open Space and Trails program. However, private land is huntable with permission.

    But private land is diminishing. In January, Pitkin County Open Space and Trails Board voted unanimously to purchase 650 acres of private land in upper Snowmass Creek Valley to reclassify it to BLM open space.

    According to wildlife advocates, limiting hunting units in Colorado become problematic for wildlife management. “Management of ecosystems is important,” Maher said. “By virtue of the fact that humans are here, we must manage this system” to ensure the well-being of animals and the environment.

    Between 1970 and 2000, hunting license sales revenue increased from $600 million to $1.1 billion according to The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service reports. However, revenue remained stagnant over the next two decades.

    Data from the Congressional Research Service reports that between 2017 and 2022, excise tax collected from the sale of firearms increased from $600 million (inflation adjusted) to $1.1 billion due to increased sales during the pandemic but not to sales for hunting equipment. However, funding from the U.S. Congress has decreased since 2015.

    Hunting is an integral part of maintaining a stable deer and elk population. Lands maintained by hunting license revenues distributed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service are more likely to support natural wildlife.

    The “availability of food sources in the wilderness is a factor in monitoring the population,” wildlife advocate Mark Surls said. This becomes a closed-loop, sustainable ecosystem.

    The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service operating budget, is partially funded through congressional appropriations. In 2024, the operating budget was $4.1 billion with $1.722 billion allocated by the government and the balance coming from grants, excise tax revenue and hunting license sales.

    Public opinion contributes to the hunter’s image in the U.S. On Nov. 5, voters were given a choice through “Cats Aren’t Trophies” Proposition 127 to decide whether Colorado Parks and Wildlife would continue to manage the mountain lion population by issuing hunting licenses.

    “Hunting deer is fair chase,” wildlife advocate Carol Monaco said. But hound hunting “mountain lion is cruel.” It isn’t helping anyone and “very few big cats are dressed for consumption. We need to learn to coexist with wildlife.”

    Surls advocates that hound hunting is unethical and should be removed from the hunting license options because “it gives our hunters a bad name for violations of fair chase,” integrity in hunting.

    Some critics combine hunting for food with “trophy hunting.” Trophy hunting is hunting wild animals for sport and keeping body parts for display, not food. Mesa County Commissioner Cody Davis commented that this type of rhetoric is needless with an “end route to limit hunting” and “trophy hunting is already illegal in Colorado.”

    Proposition 127 aimed to remove mountain lion population management from the Colorado Parks and Wildlife. In Nov. 290,000 voters rejected the proposition. In a compromising effort at a public engagement meeting critics of mountain lion hunting demanded that “guaranteed kill” be removed from hunting outfitter’s advertising because it is illegal in Colorado and a violation of CPW’s policy.

    “We want to work with Colorado Parks and Wildlife,” Monaco said, “in every way so they can do their job” managing wildlife population.

    As hunting license sales decrease, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service funding must be replaced with a new source. Hunting licenses are an important source of revenue.

    “Colorado Parks and Wildlife are brilliant at managing the wildlife population and it should stay that way. It is a scientific method of conservation,” Davis said

  • Proposition 127: The end of lion hunting in Colorado?

    Mountains northeast of Durango brings fourth-highest harvest of mountain lions

    By Colorado Student News Service

    Friday, Nov 1, 2024 11:00 AM Updated Friday, Nov. 1, 2024 5:59 PM

    Records from Colorado Parks and Wildlife shows 2,600 hunters killed 502 mountain lions in 2022-2023, the most recent period for which statistics are available. (Courtesy of the National Parks Service, via The Colorado Sun)

    In the early morning chill of Colorado’s rugged wilderness, the rhythmic panting of hounds echoes through the trees as they close in on their elusive target, a mountain lion.

    For hunters, the video from a Durango outfitter, shows a moment steeped in tradition and survival skills, but such moments may soon disappear from the Colorado landscape. On Nov. 5, voters will decide the fate of mountain lion and bobcat hunting in Colorado, with Proposition 127 seeking to ban the practice entirely.

    The group “Cats Aren’t Trophies” gathered about 188,000 signatures to put a measure on the November ballot.

    While the group’s name references “trophies,” Colorado Parks and Wildlife considers trophy hunting to be illegal in Colorado. Hunters are expected to eat and use what they kill, based on a hunting brochure from the state agency.

    Public records from the state agency show a highly regulated hunting environment where 2,600 hunters killed 502 cats in 2022-2023, the most recent period for which statistics are available.

    The fourth highest number of mountain lions killed – 11 – came from an area in the mountains northeast of Durango and La Plata County. The rest of the mountain lions killed around the state were in the single digits, mostly in remote, mountainous areas.

    The 21 mountain lions killed in a remote area northeast of Meeker in 2022-2023 was the largest number for any area in Colorado, based on public records provided by Kara Van Hoose, a Colorado Parks and Wildlife spokeswoman. The next largest number of mountain lions killed were in a mountainous southern part of the state near Interstate 25, where 16 were killed in one Colorado Parks and Wildlife statistical area and 15 were killed in the neighboring area. Colorado Parks and Wildlife maps do not follow county lines around the state but are numbered by region.

    Van Hoose declined to comment on specific questions related to Proposition 127 so as to remain neutral during the election period. She declined to comment on how current legal hunts affect the economy or how banning mountain lion hunts could affect wildlife and cattle, among other things. Colorado Parks and Wildlife started regulating hunting licenses for mountain lions in 1965 after the mountain lion population declined, according to information on the state agency’s website.

    Van Hoose said that Colorado Parks and Wildlife surveys wildlife populations by helicopter, among other things, to decide how many licenses will be available to hunters every year.

    “We set licenses depending on a lot of different factors. There are environmental factors and external factors,” Van Hoose said.

    The most emotional part of the hunting discussion appears to be how some Colorado outfitters use GPS-collared dogs to track and hunt mountain lions. Hound hunting is legal in Colorado.

    Some 88% of Colorado residents disapprove of hunters using dogs to help with hunting and 78% disapprove of “trophy hunting” of mountain lions, according to an August Colorado State University study published in the Society for Conservation Biology journal.

    Kelly Maher, a Colorado hunter, said she teaches her children to honor the animals that the family hunts “by consuming and using every part of the animal.” She said proponents of Proposition 127 don’t like the hound hunting, “but the cat needs to be stationary to identify its sex and status.”

    The people who gathered signatures to get Proposition 127 on the ballot feel that hunting mountain lions with GPS-equipped dogs “gives our hunters a bad name for violations of fair chase,” according to Mark Surls, the volunteer and outreach coordinator for the group.

    A group supporting continued mountain lion hunting is called Colorado’s Wildlife Deserve Better, which includes funding help from the Colorado Cattlemen’s Association and the Colorado Wool Growers Association. And the Board of Mesa County Commissioners in Grand Junction unanimously approved a resolution opposing Colorado Proposition 127 on Tuesday, Sept. 24.

    Colorado Parks and Wildlife requires hunters to take an exam and buy a license to hunt mountain lions. About 3,800 to 4,400 mountain lions live in Colorado, according to the state agency, but most people never see them because they’re active at night.

    About the Colorado Media Project

    The University of Colorado journalism program has a $10,000 grant from the Colorado Media Project, as you know, and we’re working with eight newsrooms this semester in rural and underserved communities mostly around the Western Slope, including The Journal, Ark Valley Voice, Aspen Times, Bucket List Community Café, Colorado Newsline, Denver Urban Spectrum, Rio Blanco Herald Tribune, Sopris Sun/Sol del Valle and Enterate Latino.

    Readers can the Colorado Media Project and the class by contacting Elizabeth Potter and the students at elizabeth.potter@colorado.edu.

    Colorado Media Project | Courtesy of Colorado Media Project

    Common Sense Institute Colorado, a nonpartisan group interested in protecting Colorado’s economy, reports that Proposition 127, if passed, would cause an overall “$4 million to $6.2 million in lost Colorado Parks and Wildlife revenue.”

    Of the total, the Common Sense group says there would be a direct loss of $410,000 from mountain lion and bobcat hunting licenses. The group estimates that Colorado Parks and Wildlife would lose a separate $3.6 to $5.8 million in elk and deer hunting permit revenue because the increased mountain lion population would keep the elk and deer population down.

    Reporting by Adair Teuton, Bella Hammond, Caniya Robinson, Jackson Jupille, Lincoln Roch and Melodie Miller.

    https://www.the-journal.com/articles/proposition-127-the-end-of-lion-hunting-in-colorado/